Government takes heat for metadata bill
The government’s introduction of a mandatory telecom metadata retention bill has reignited the debate over potential implications of such a law.
Announcing the bill last week, attorney general George Brandis said metadata is essential for fighting serious crimes including terrorism, espionage, cybersecurity, organised crime, murder, rape, kidnapping, child sex abuse and child pornography.
He said law enforcement and security agencies have been calling out for laws requiring the retention of metadata for two years.
Brandis has subsequently asserted that telecom metadata can't and won't be used to pursue litigation for online copyright violation. He told ABC’s Q&A http://www.abc.net.au/tv/qanda/ that the proposed regime only applies to the most serious crimes.
This contradicts the assertion by AFP commissioner Andrew Colvin that metadata will be useful for pursuing illegal downloads. Colvin subsequently had to clarify that copyright is a civil matter, and the proposed law could only be used to enforce criminal laws.
But intellectual property legal expert Dr Metthew Rimmer, associate professor at the ANU’s College of Law, told Computerworld Australia that there are criminal offences associated with Australian copyright law, and that the AFP takes a role in IP enforcement.
Rimmer criticised the government for “shifting their position day by day in relation to very basic questions about the relationship between IP and data retention,” and Brandis for appearing not to know the basic offences under Australian copyright law.
Greens senator Scott Ludlam has meanwhile hit out at the proposed legislation as an “outrageous attack on Australians’ fundamental right to privacy”.
Labor’s response has so far been more noncommittal, with the party calling for more time to consider the proposed bill.
“This legislation is complex and contentious. It is broader than national security. It has privacy implications and could also potentially increase the cost of internet bills. It therefore needs to be subject to robust scrutiny over months not weeks,” shadow communications minister Jason Clare said in a statement.
Emergency onboarding: what to do before and after a data breach
Organisations that have an emergency onboarding plan are better positioned to have their business...
Savvy directors are demanding more points of proof when cyber incidents occur
Pre-agreement on what a post-incident forensics effort should produce — and testing it out...
Cyber-attack prevention is better than a cure
Corporate and political decision-makers need to invest in areas that do a better job of...
